[Wiki Loves Monuments] monuments without official list
vira.motorko at gmail.com
Wed Aug 17 19:23:08 UTC 2016
In Ukrainian WLM we use only lists from authorities. I think that WMUA as
an organisation is not empowered to decide what is a monument and what is
not, neither on our own nor on advice.
The lists are buggy and incomplete, indeed (not an uncommon issue, as I
But there is a side effect: during the contest Ukrainian media use the gap
between what deserves to be protected and what actually is protected to
draw attention to the monuments preservation problems in the country.
project manager, Wikimedia Ukraine <https://ua.wikimedia.org/> non-profit
m: +380667740499 | f: vira.motorko <https://www.facebook.com/vira.motorko> |
w: Ата <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Ата>
Are you saving your documents in free formats? ;)
Help save natural resources – please think twice before printing this
e-mail or any attachments.
2016-08-17 18:57 GMT+03:00 Lily <lilyofthewest.wikimedia at gmail.com>:
> Hi Johnattan,
> On Tuesday, August 16, 2016, Johnattan Rupire <jarjacha at riseup.net> wrote:
>> What we can do with the monuments that aren't in the authorities list
>> for low coverage from government?
>> I think here we have many monuments in
>> many government list. How you do with these kind of monuments?
> Based on the above two statements, I'm hearing from you that 1) the
> official list of monuments from the government has a lot of missing
> monuments, 2) there are other monument lists gathered by the government. If
> the latter is correct, can you provide links to these other monuments lists
> by the government? This information can help us help you better.
>> Johnattan Rupire
>> Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list
>> WikiLovesMonuments at lists.wikimedia.org
> User: LilyOfTheWest
> Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list
> WikiLovesMonuments at lists.wikimedia.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the WikiLovesMonuments