[Wiki Loves Monuments] Why deadlines exist
lodewijk at effeietsanders.org
Fri Oct 5 07:55:51 UTC 2012
hmm, good point! The unfriendlyness could perhaps be tackled by a message
on the talkpage of the uploader? (or did that already happen?). Also
replacing it with an alternative template "it was uploaded for WLM, but
unfortunately outside the allowed timeslot" in friendly wordings would be a
2012/10/5 Vicenç Riullop <vriullop at hotmail.com>
> Most concerns are for removing the WLM template, for any reason, by bot
> or not. It can be seen as an unfriendly behaviour to exclude a file for the
> contest. In fact, the submission was intented for WLM, successfully or not,
> as the template reads. A solution is to keep the template with a note, i.e.
> "uploaded after deadline", "not a registered monument", "not a participant
> country", etc. The template with any note can categorize instead in "Images
> from WLM in XX not validated" keeping track of them and allowing any
> revision. But this is an option to discuss for next year.
> > Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2012 03:19:32 +0200
> > From: polimerek at gmail.com
> > To: wikilovesmonuments at lists.wikimedia.org
> > Subject: Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] Why deadlines exist
> > Dura lex, sed lex - but I would like to avoid such situations. This
> > guy was really angry - his pictures were really good - so in fact -
> > Wikimedia Commons lost a good photographer.
> Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list
> WikiLovesMonuments at lists.wikimedia.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the WikiLovesMonuments