[Wiki Loves Monuments] Wiki Loves Monuments was crap, it's high time to admit it!

[Maarten Dammers]

> 2011/12/12 Yaroslav M. Blanter<putevod at mccme.ru>:
>> I think this is a good direction, but I can not support the proposal in
>> this form. What if we have just one crappy image? What if we have the image
>> of the exterior, would we need the image of the interior? What if we have
>> several monuments under one code?

Let's put it a bit stronger. I would never support such a proposal. I 
support positive steering ("we encourage you to upload photo's of 
monuments that not yet have a (good) picture"), not negative steering 
("WLM2011 we limit the eligible monuments to those without an image").

Op 12-12-2011 21:31, Strainu schreef:

> Then you could just make a list of ineligible monuments. The problem
> is that without a clear rule, you will have trouble explaining this
> "non-ok list" to the participants. It's unfortunate that you have
> multiple monuments with the same code. In Romania, this is solved by
> appending 2 more digits at the end of the code. Perhaps you could
> generate an "unofficial" code using a similar algorithm?
That borders original research.

Maarten