[Wiki Loves Monuments] WLM photos are deleted on Commons
Alexander Tsirlin
altsirlin at gmail.com
Sun Sep 18 01:23:45 UTC 2016
Dear Lodewijk,
I find it a bit difficult to assume good faith when someone approaches
me with a knife. I find it more natural to defend, and that's what we
have to do now.
I truly regret that Commons did not develop a more civil approach than
submitting deletion requests on every possible occasion. Even if we
assume that this is the reasonable course of action, it hardly makes
sense for WLM, because only uploaders receive notifications about
possible file deletion. The organizers have no idea about it, although
they should be contacted in the first turn. Most of the uploaders are
new users who do not speak English. What do you expect to hear from them?
All photos related to WLM Russia contain a template saying:
> Please read the guidelines
> <https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Monuments_database_in_Russia>
> before making any changes that can affect the monuments database!
If you actually read the guidelines, you will see the following:
> If you see a potential candidate for deletion, *inform us in the first
> place*. We will organize the file transfer and you will be able to
> delete the photo afterwards. Should you do it differently and nominate
> a WLM/WLE photo for deletion without informing us, this will be highly
> detrimental and disrespectful to our work. We don't like vandals.
All these deletion requests are indeed highly disrespectful to our work.
But they happen, and we have no other choice but to fight against that.
And whet our knives, because we will likely need them.
Sincerely,
Alexander
On 17.09.2016 12:17, Lodewijk wrote:
> Hey Alexander,
>
> Assuming good faith is always good - even if you have to work harder
> for it. It makes the interactions more pleasant and the work more fun.
> So I will always recommend to keep doing it - even if it goes against
> your natural response.
>
> The case where the names don't seem to match seems like a valid case
> to me to ask questions, and this process is (unfortunately) the
> process being used for that at Wikimedia Commons. It is uncomfortable,
> but it is what we have to deal with. Because there are so many
> pictures, there is a bunch to be expected.
>
> I'm not going to pretend that the Wikimedia Commons community is
> always easy or fun to work with - but their intentions are usually
> good. They are very tough on copyright, and very suspicious. While
> these are some disadvantages, it does allow us to use a lot of shared
> infrastructure, and makes competitions like this one possible on an
> international scale. Please do realise that the number of uploads
> typically raises with 30-100% during Wiki Loves Monuments, and this
> puts some stress/strain on the reviewers too.
>
> Best,
> Lodewijk
>
> 2016-09-17 8:58 GMT+02:00 Alexander Tsirlin <altsirlin at gmail.com
> <mailto:altsirlin at gmail.com>>:
>
>> Rather than complaining to the process could you please for once
>> think that this is your project too and everyone in this together?
> It is not my project. Like many other people, I am forced to use
> it as a common image repository, even though I emphatically do not
> want to. As you probably know, before migrating to WMF servers
> Wikivoyage had its own image repository, and we wanted to keep it,
> because it was much better organized than Commons, and we did not
> want other people to impose their rules and practices of
> "nominating everything for deletion" on images that we have
> carefully collected ourselves.
>
> Unfortunately, our request was ignored by the WMF, so yes, we are
> also in this strange thing that was supposed to be a common
> project, but is in fact run by a handful of people who believe
> that unjustified and well-hidden deletion requests are the best
> way to solve all problems. But it stinks, and we try to be as far
> from it as possible.
>
> Your experience of license review for WLM Bangladesh might be
> interesting if we would ever have time to do this. At the moment,
> I spend most of my free time on finding and fighting these
> well-hidden deletion requests. Thank you, my dear Commons
> community, for creating such a wonderful working environment.
>
> Sincerely,
> Alexander
>
>
>
> On 17.09.2016 11:32, Nahid Sultan wrote:
>>
>> Though it seems a bit odd but on a commons perspective it is also
>> a normal procedure. Commons has a huge issue with people finding
>> images online and then uploading them as their own work,
>> so regular contributors on commons can sometimes be overzealous
>> in making sure that people actually have the right to release
>> what they are releasing. That is where the OTRS system comes in.
>> Rather than complaining to the process could you please for once
>> think that this is your project too and everyone in this together?
>>
>>
>> We, from WLM Bangladesh team have created a work-board/list for
>> such users who have problem with metadata, previously published
>> same image on other media to make sure that they are actually own
>> the copyright. we even created a hand book for reviewers
>> explaining what to look during the review
>> (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:NahidSultan/WLM
>> <https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:NahidSultan/WLM>). So,
>> every reviewer check for those mistakes when reviewing an
>> image then if they found such problematic user they immediately
>> contact them via email or talk page and list them on
>> https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:NahidSultan/WLM/possible_copyright_problem
>> <https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:NahidSultan/WLM/possible_copyright_problem>.
>> It works for us.
>>
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Nahid Sultan
>>
>> User:NahidSultan
>> <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:NahidSultan>on all
>> Wikimedia Foundation
>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation>'s public wikis
>>
>> Secretary, Wikimedia Bangladesh
>> <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Bangladesh>
>>
>> Twitter: @nahidunlimited <https://twitter.com/nahidunlimited>
>>
>> http://blog.nahidsultan.xyz/
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> *From:* WikiLovesMonuments
>> <wikilovesmonuments-bounces at lists.wikimedia.org>
>> <mailto:wikilovesmonuments-bounces at lists.wikimedia.org> on behalf
>> of Alexander Tsirlin <altsirlin at gmail.com>
>> <mailto:altsirlin at gmail.com>
>> *Sent:* Saturday, September 17, 2016 11:09 AM
>> *To:* Wiki Loves Monuments Photograph Competition
>> *Subject:* Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] WLM photos are deleted on
>> Commons
>> Now it is not only about Freedom of Panorama and non-free images.
>>
>> https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_VekaSpb
>> <https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_VekaSpb>
>> Here, one Commons user nominates a bunch of excellent photos for
>> deletion after he sees that the user name does not match the name in
>> EXIF, even though the connection between the two is pretty
>> obvious. This
>> deletion request has been closed yesterday, but it still costed
>> me a lot
>> of time and a long e-mail exchange with the uploader, where I
>> tried to
>> convince her that everything is fine, and this deletion request
>> was only
>> a mistake. Yes, just a small mistake, really...
>>
>> https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_PhotoJinn
>> <https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_PhotoJinn>
>> Here, the same user nominates for deletion some photos of a 13th
>> century
>> cathedral claiming that there is no freedom of panorama. What???!
>>
>> ---------------------------------------
>>
>> That's a very systematic course of action against us taking place on
>> Commons. It would be silly to assume good faith here.
>>
>> Best,
>> Alexander
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list
>> WikiLovesMonuments at lists.wikimedia.org
>> <mailto:WikiLovesMonuments at lists.wikimedia.org>
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments
>> <https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments>
>> http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org <http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list
>> WikiLovesMonuments at lists.wikimedia.org
>> <mailto:WikiLovesMonuments at lists.wikimedia.org>
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments
>> <https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments>
>> http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org <http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org>
> _______________________________________________ Wiki Loves
> Monuments mailing list WikiLovesMonuments at lists.wikimedia.org
> <mailto:WikiLovesMonuments at lists.wikimedia.org>
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments
> <https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments>
> http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org <http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list
> WikiLovesMonuments at lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments
> http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikilovesmonuments/attachments/20160918/a6c912ce/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the WikiLovesMonuments
mailing list