[Wiki Loves Monuments] Moving monuments database to Wikidata

[Andre Koopal]

Very quickly (I am at work), no, the original function should not be the
reason the object made it into the WLM list, the fact that it is a
'rijksmonument' and thus have a rijksmonument-id is the reason to make it
in the list.

Regards,

André


On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Jane Darnell <jane023 at gmail.com> wrote:

> OK I am now looking at your Q number Q5642705 and I see that it is a hall,
> so I expect it to be an instance of hall, but it's not and it's an instance
> of architectural structure. This item has an enwiki Wikipedia article and
> when I click what links here I see the WLM list here:
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Listed_buildings_in_Birmingham
> Here I see only 4 columns - name, grade, date and architect
>
> An item that is also a hall in NL is a water board building called a
> gemeenlandshuis. Here is an example item
> https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q2847105
> This is an instance of gemeenlandshuis which in turn is a subclass of hall.
>
> On the Dutch Wikipedia when I click what links here I see the link to the
> WLM list here:
>
> https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lijst_van_rijksmonumenten_in_Haarlemmerliede_en_Spaarnwoude
> This list has eight columns - name, original function, date, architect,
> location, coordinates, WLM ID, photo
>
> The column headings should be coming from the monuments database, and the
> original function should be the reason the object made it into the WLM list.
>
> I think both of these items should be part of a corresponding list on
> Wikidata. When I click what links here on Wikidata I see nothing that takes
> me to WLM. The only clue is the property P1435 for the British Q and
> property P359 for the Dutch Q.
>
> Maybe we should augment the corresponding list items with their members so
> that when you click what links here you are taken to the Q number of of the
> list item? This effectively migrates the lists to Wikidata
>
> On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 12:42 PM, Andy Mabbett <andy at pigsonthewing.org.uk>
> wrote:
>
>> On 26 July 2015 at 07:42, Jane Darnell <jane023 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > So such wikipedia articles should be labelled " instance of"  <the name
>> of
>> > your identifier used in WLM>.
>>
>> I believe that method has been deprecated, and it is preferred to use
>> a property P1435 ("heritage status" in English):
>>
>>     https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property:P1435
>>
>> as done, for example, on:
>>
>>    https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q5642705
>>
>> --
>> Andy Mabbett
>> @pigsonthewing
>> http://pigsonthewing.org.uk
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list
>> WikiLovesMonuments at lists.wikimedia.org
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments
>> http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list
> WikiLovesMonuments at lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments
> http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikilovesmonuments/attachments/20150727/bea02e10/attachment-0001.html>