[Wiki Loves Monuments] [Wikimedia-l] New Program Evaluation report: Wiki Loves Monuments

[Strainu]

2014-01-25 rupert THURNER <rupert.thurner at gmail.com>:
> On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 4:37 PM, LiAnna Davis <ldavis at wikimedia.org> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 4:45 AM, rupert THURNER <rupert.thurner at gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>> lianna, where did you get that number from?
>>>
>>> I want credit for this report to go where it belongs -- the Program
>> Evaluation team! I'm just assisting with publishing and distributing the
>> report; the work in it is a whole team effort, including contributions from
>> Frank Schulenburg, Dr. Jaime Anstee, Yuan Li, and Edward Galvez. Their hard
>> work went into data collection, reporting, and analysis; I just did some
>> minor copy editing and publicizing. :)
>>
>> But that being said, I encourage everyone to post comments and questions
>> on the talk page, which is where the program evaluation team will be more
>> likely to see and answer them, rather than having parallel discussions on
>> multiple lists:
>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Programs_talk:Evaluation_portal/Library/WLM
>>
>>
>> oh, my english is bad, i of course ment how you calculated the number.
> there must be some tools available to do this, and ideally they are online
> for everybody. 60'000 images used is such an impressive number ... it still
> leaves me speachless :)
>


Do you mean the number of images? You might like to analyse the stats page:
https://toolserver.org/~emijrp/wlm/stats.php

It might not match 100% what the report says, as some images were
deleted, but it should be pretty close. You also have raw data if you
want to make your own statistics.