[Wiki Loves Monuments] Judging System Signup

Lodewijk lodewijk at effeietsanders.org
Thu Oct 11 07:17:35 UTC 2012


Hi Jason,

could you set up one for the international jury too? I only want the star
level for 5 users (and myself as admin). I would like to be able to feed in
a list of url's/file names either myself or through your help.

Thanks!

Lodewijk

2012/10/8 maarten deneckere <maartendeneckere at gmail.com>

> Hey all,
>
> South Africa wants to use the judging tool as well. Can you send me more
> information, and the login details?
>
> Regards,
> Maarten
>
>
> 2012/10/5 Nkansah Rexford <nkansahrexford at gmail.com>
>
>> +1 Cristian
>>
>>
>> On Friday, October 5, 2012, Cristian Consonni wrote:
>>
>>> 2012/10/1 Nicu Buculei <nicubunu at gmail.com>:
>>> > - also I have to acknowledge I was confused at first with the position
>>> of
>>> > the "accept" and "reject" icons, a few times I clicked on the wrong
>>> ones, I
>>> > expected them to be below the pictures but they were at the top;
>>>
>>> I think this has been fixed by adding the colored semi-transparent  to
>>> the images (green for accepted, black for the others) anyway, I think
>>> a framing will be better because you may want to lok again at the
>>> images before updating the decision
>>>
>>> > - the filtering is going to be used my more people at the same time.
>>> One
>>> > user will browse the images, accept some, reject some but also defer
>>> some,
>>> > leaving the decision for others. A faster way to navigate the images is
>>> > needed, perhaps in the footer in addition to "<< Start || < Previous
>>> || Next
>>> >>" some way to jump to "page N".
>>>
>>> > For the second stage, image rating, I only saw a screenshot so far so
>>> for
>>> > now I have a single request: a more fine-grained noting system. When
>>> the
>>> > jury is small, only 1-5 stars is to little and will produce a lot of
>>> > collisions, multiple image with the same score.
>>> > Last year in my country we had every member of the jury give an image 3
>>> > scores from 1 to 10 for different criteria: artistic quality, technical
>>> > quality and usefulness for Wikipedia and made a pondered sum (50%,
>>> 30%, 20%)
>>> > for a final note for each person.
>>> > While this may be overkill for the global competition and juries in
>>> every
>>> > country, moving to 1-5 stars is way too little. I will think a bit more
>>> > about how comfortable a 1-10 rating per image is.
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> Cristian
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list
>>> WikiLovesMonuments at lists.wikimedia.org
>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments
>>> http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> +Nyarko Rexford <https://plus.google.com/u/0/107174506890941499078>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list
>> WikiLovesMonuments at lists.wikimedia.org
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments
>> http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list
> WikiLovesMonuments at lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments
> http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/private/wikilovesmonuments/attachments/20121011/82392c6a/attachment.html>


More information about the WikiLovesMonuments mailing list