[Wiki Loves Monuments] Judging System Signup
nkansahrexford at gmail.com
Fri Oct 5 20:43:39 UTC 2012
On Friday, October 5, 2012, Cristian Consonni wrote:
> > - also I have to acknowledge I was confused at first with the position of
> > the "accept" and "reject" icons, a few times I clicked on the wrong
> ones, I
> > expected them to be below the pictures but they were at the top;
> I think this has been fixed by adding the colored semi-transparent to
> the images (green for accepted, black for the others) anyway, I think
> a framing will be better because you may want to lok again at the
> images before updating the decision
> > - the filtering is going to be used my more people at the same time. One
> > user will browse the images, accept some, reject some but also defer
> > leaving the decision for others. A faster way to navigate the images is
> > needed, perhaps in the footer in addition to "<< Start || < Previous ||
> >>" some way to jump to "page N".
> > For the second stage, image rating, I only saw a screenshot so far so for
> > now I have a single request: a more fine-grained noting system. When the
> > jury is small, only 1-5 stars is to little and will produce a lot of
> > collisions, multiple image with the same score.
> > Last year in my country we had every member of the jury give an image 3
> > scores from 1 to 10 for different criteria: artistic quality, technical
> > quality and usefulness for Wikipedia and made a pondered sum (50%, 30%,
> > for a final note for each person.
> > While this may be overkill for the global competition and juries in every
> > country, moving to 1-5 stars is way too little. I will think a bit more
> > about how comfortable a 1-10 rating per image is.
> Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list
+Nyarko Rexford <https://plus.google.com/u/0/107174506890941499078>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the WikiLovesMonuments