[Wiki Loves Monuments] Uploader stats

Itzik Edri itzik at infra.co.il
Fri Oct 5 20:33:52 UTC 2012


Erik sent it from start with a copy to the mailing list :-) but indeed, I
selected ''reply to all'', strange he didn't send a copy to him...

Itzik

- Sent from my mobile device
On Oct 5, 2012 10:30 PM, "Matthew Roth" <mroth at wikimedia.org> wrote:

> Hi Itzik,
> I don't know if Erik was on that thread. I'm cc'ing him here.
>
> -Matthew
>
> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Itzik Edri <itzik at infra.co.il> wrote:
>
>> Hi Erik,
>>
>> Thanks for sharing that. I know tomasz plan to share also mobile upload
>> stats that could be interesting...
>>
>> Take into consideration that in Israel people still uploading photos
>> until the 15th. It's not thousands of photos per day, but still can effect
>> the finall number a little...
>>
>> Itzik
>>
>> - Sent from my mobile device
>> On Oct 5, 2012 7:37 PM, "Erik Zachte" <ezachte at wikimedia.org> wrote:
>>
>>> First congrats for the overall success of WLM 2012, and also for the
>>> awesome stats at http://toolserver.org/~emijrp/wlm/stats.php****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> Here are some extra stats about uploaders, with focus on new vs
>>> experienced contributors:****
>>>
>>> These data are provisional, while we vet input further (last chart seems
>>> to indicate there is still some anomaly), see at '==>'****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> This chart shows how the three WLM event lead to increasingly large
>>> peaks in new editors (on any project).****
>>>
>>> http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:WLM_uploaders_2010-2012_linear.png
>>> ****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> Same chart with logarithmic  y axis. This shows that numbers of old
>>> hands contributing to WLM is non-negligible.****
>>>
>>> http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:WLM_uploaders_2010-2012_log.png**
>>> **
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> For completeness sake, similar linear and log charts where only WLM 2012
>>> is taken into account. ****
>>>
>>> http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:WLM_uploaders_2012_linear.png****
>>>
>>> http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:WLM_uploaders_2012_log.png****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> Following bar chart shows experienced vs new uploaders to each WLM event.
>>> ****
>>>
>>>
>>> http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:WLM_uploaders_2010-2012_bar_chart_corrected.png
>>> ****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> Last chart is similar as first chart, now with remaining Commons
>>> contributors to namespace 6 plotted as second line.****
>>>
>>> Surprisingly there is still a big leap in non WLM editors in Sep 2012 **
>>> **
>>>
>>>
>>> http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:WLM_uploaders_2010-2012_vs_other_NS6_editors_linear.png
>>> ****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> ==> (hmmm, seems too coincidental, are we missing WML participants ?, in
>>> other words should some users still move from red to blue line ?)****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> Also updated is monthly Wikistats report:****
>>>
>>> http://stats.wikimedia.org/wikispecial/EN/TablesWikipediaCOMMONS.htm****
>>>
>>> Note that there was no time after closure of month to produce and
>>> process full archive dump. That will happen in coming week, and  overall
>>> article counts and too much lesser degree editor activity counts will drop
>>> a few percent, but it should not affect uploader counts.  (reason: for stub
>>> dump we cannot apply all official criteria for proper articles, as page
>>> content is not available: no check for internal or category link).****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> Also noteworthy: you can see which people are most active on the mailing
>>> list:
>>> http://www.infodisiac.com/Wikipedia/ScanMail/WikiLovesMonuments.html****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> --****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> Some more details: ****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> Each year I get a list of user names of people who contribute to WLM. **
>>> **
>>>
>>> In 2010 the list contained 201 names, in 2011 there were 5462 names and
>>> this year 14994. ****
>>>
>>> That is 25 less than the 15019 mentioned on
>>> http://toolserver.org/~emijrp/wlm/stats.php****
>>>
>>> * *
>>>
>>> I found edits for 14737 out of the list of 14994 that was provided, that
>>> may need further scrutiny (maybe some unicode names got mixed up) ****
>>>
>>> * *
>>>
>>> *Platonides:*
>>>
>>> *If we restrict to valid submissions:*
>>>
>>> *> time sql commonswiki_p "SELECT DISTINCT user_name FROM
>>> u_platonides_wlm_p.wlm2012 JOIN user ON (user_id=wlm_author) WHERE
>>> wlm_source = 'commons' AND wlm_status='Participating';" >
>>> wlmParticipatingUsernames.txt*
>>>
>>> *http://toolserver.org/~platonides/sandbox/wlmParticipatingUsernames.txt
>>> *
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list
>>> WikiLovesMonuments at lists.wikimedia.org
>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments
>>> http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list
>> WikiLovesMonuments at lists.wikimedia.org
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments
>> http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Matthew Roth
> Global Communications Manager
> Wikimedia Foundation
> +1.415.839.6885 ext 6635
> www.wikimediafoundation.org
> *https://donate.wikimedia.org*
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list
> WikiLovesMonuments at lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments
> http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/private/wikilovesmonuments/attachments/20121005/dffa1252/attachment.html>


More information about the WikiLovesMonuments mailing list