[Wiki Loves Monuments] copyright

Raul Kern raunator at gmail.com
Mon Apr 25 04:14:13 UTC 2011


As I said in first posting
1) pictures that are allowed for local Wikipedia should be eligible
for WLM local competition. Keep It Simple Stupid principle for local
participiants -- they should not know the details about Freedom of
Panorama in local Copyright Law.

2) And pictures that are allowed to Commons are only eligble for
pan-European WLM competition.

If the 1 and 2 don't match, then the additional technical complexity
will be up to local organisers to handle.


--
Raul

2011/4/25 Edo de Roo <edoderoo at gmail.com>:
> I agree on this.
> Let images on commons be part of the contest,
> other images are still welcome to be used on a local wiki
>
> This will be straightforward and clear,
> Edo
> On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 11:50 PM, Lodewijk <lodewijk at effeietsanders.org>
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>> let's simplify this discussion, and assume that there just happens to be a
>> situation where images are allowed on a specific wiki, but not on commons -
>> the question is, should they be eligable to the contest. (I think the exact
>> discussion about the copyright status is a bit too complicated to have right
>> here right now - but is of course an important one to answer).
>> I think more opinions would be welcome, but my take would be: KISS - only
>> allow images through commons, that would keep the rules the simplest and the
>> tools probably as well. Also that would be the simplest for tourists who
>> might want to participate.
>> Best,
>> Lodewijk
>>
>> 2011/4/24 Tomasz Ganicz <polimerek at gmail.com>
>>>
>>> 2011/4/24 Raul Kern <raunator at gmail.com>:
>>> > In Estonian Wikipedia we have a copyright exemption
>>> > (http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Resolution:Licensing_policy) for
>>> > photos of buildings, statues etc., whose authors have not died
>>> > recently (70 years after death hasen't passed yet).
>>> > These photos are tagged with
>>> > http://et.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mall:KunstiteoseFoto.
>>>
>>> Do you mean the pictures of objects of which their architect or author
>>> has not died before 1939 ? What is a legal basis to use these pictures
>>> on Estonian Wikipedia if the freedom of panorama does not work? Is
>>> there any other copyright exemption for such the pictures you can use,
>>> or is just a kind of "fair use"?
>>>
>>> If there is any exempt in Estonian copyright law, except fair use -
>>> which allows to use such these pictures in Estonian Wikipedia - there
>>> is no reason why not to let it upload to Commons...  Simply this
>>> exempt should be properly described on Commons.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Tomek "Polimerek" Ganicz
>>> http://pl.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Polimerek
>>> http://www.ganicz.pl/poli/
>>> http://www.cbmm.lodz.pl/work.php?id=29&title=tomasz-ganicz
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list
>>> WikiLovesMonuments at lists.wikimedia.org
>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments
>>> http://www.wikilovesmonuments.eu
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list
>> WikiLovesMonuments at lists.wikimedia.org
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments
>> http://www.wikilovesmonuments.eu
>
>
>
> --
> [I don't print e-mails. Do you?]
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list
> WikiLovesMonuments at lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments
> http://www.wikilovesmonuments.eu
>




More information about the WikiLovesMonuments mailing list