[Mediawiki-i18n] Pseudolocalization

Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijssen at gmail.com
Wed Sep 22 23:27:44 UTC 2010


Hoi,
There are scripts that need more space to be legible.. There are scripts
that are top down.. development for this is under way to support the
SignWriting script in MediaWiki. This allow for the writing of sign
languages,
Thanks,
      GerardM

On 22 September 2010 23:59, Neil Kandalgaonkar <neilk at wikimedia.org> wrote:

> On 9/22/10 12:54 PM, Niklas Laxström wrote:
> > On 22 September 2010 20:51, Neil Kandalgaonkar<neilk at wikimedia.org>
>  wrote:
> >> The idea is that you can test for three things even before the
> >> translators get to it:
> >>    - which parts of the system aren't internationalized yet (they are
> >> noticeable since they don't get this pseudolocalization)
> >
> > Such code wouldn't likely survive in the code review.
> >
>
> But the idea is that the *developer* should catch it themselves, before
> review.
>
>
>
> >>    - text swell (150%-200% is a good ratio)
> >
> > Web layout are usually very liquid, and thus we shouldn't have that
> > much of a problem
>
> And yet, we had such a problem today with the release of Article Feedback.
>
> The layout worked fine when it said "2 ratings" but not when it was "2
> Einschätzungen". The layout is still readable, but it doesn't flow the
> way they expected.
>
>
> >>    - any transformations that don't preserve unicode
> >
> > Such as?
>
> Hard to say. Currently PHP doesn't have a lot of gotchas like that, but
> I know they exist for other languages. Possibly they could still arise
> if someone interacted with extensions which involved non-PHP components.
>
>
>
> >  For what it's worth, double html-escaping or not escaping at
> > all is far more common problem.
>
> Agreed, but I'm addressing a different issue.
>
> (Also, I don't know how to solve that one in code. Do we even have a
> consistent policy on where escaping is supposed to happen? It seems to
> be all over the place.)
>
>
>
> >> Does MediaWiki or interwiki do anything like this? Would you like it if
> >> we did?
> >
> > It is probably impossible to do this, for the same reason we cannot do
> > 'click this interface message to translate it on sight'. There is too
> > much configuration stuff and other things abusing messages that break
> > MediaWiki if the input is unexpected.
>
> Maybe I'm not being clear about what I would like to do. Something like
> this:
>
> The idea is to allow a developer to quickly see how their page might
> look in another language -- without learning that language, waiting for
> a translation, or otherwise involving anyone else.
>
> A typical example is a monolingual English developer. They can flip
> their language prefs into xx-pseudo to see if their layout is fully
> localized, and works with text swell.
>
> How we do this: in MediaWiki, we reserve the language xx-pseudo to mean
> pseudolocalization. If it is selected, instead of looking up the string
> in the appropriate message file, we look up the string in English and
> then apply a fast transform to swap certain characters and add padding.
> The only complicated part is making sure we don't affect embedded markup
> like {{PLURAL}}. It could be done in real time, without any stored
> message file.
>
> We could even have other pseudos to mimic Chinese or Arabic.
>
> This does privilege the English-speaking developer, but they are
> typically the biggest problem. ;)
>
> --
> Neil Kandalgaonkar ( ) <neilk at wikimedia.org>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mediawiki-i18n mailing list
> Mediawiki-i18n at lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-i18n
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/mediawiki-i18n/attachments/20100923/6258a291/attachment.htm 


More information about the Mediawiki-i18n mailing list